Re: rmap15a swappy?
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2002-12-13 02:08:03
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Sean Neakums wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Sean Neakums wrote: Indeed, the older rmaps swapped later. However, swapping a little bit earlier turns out to be faster for almost all workloads.Oh right, because if you get sudden memory pressure you have a bunch of pages that you can just throw away without writeout?
Exactly.
Anyway, that's nifty. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a regression.
I know there are a few regressions in "strange" corner cases, stuff I can easily reproduce with special test programs but haven't seen in real life. I'm still ironing out those. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/