Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15b
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2002-12-17 21:42:23
Also in:
lkml
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2002-12-17 21:42:23
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Georg Nikodym wrote:
Incidentally, a colleague claimed to have seem this behaviour on a non-rmap 2.4.20.
1. Known behaviour? 2. Is there any data that I should be collecting that people are interested in? 3. Or should I just go back to 2.4.19-rmap14b (which did not trouble me in this way)?
The suspect is the disk elevator, which isn't scheduling requests in a way to cause lower read latency, but is optimised more for throughput. This results in some pauses. I'll need to look into it. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/