Re: VM trouble, both 2.4 and 2.5
From: Rene Herman <hidden>
Date: 2002-11-16 00:18:40
On Friday 15 November 2002 23:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
Are you *sure* it happens with ext2? Checked /proc/mounts to ensure that /tmp is really ext2?
Darn it! You are absolutely correct, /tmp was on /, ext3 builtin, ext2 as module, so it was really still ext3. /bin/mount lied to me. When I moved /tmp to its own partition, really ext2 this time, things stopped misbehaving. That ext2/ext3 thing was the very first thing I tried, wasted a lot of time :-(
I could certainly believe that the (weird) ext3 behaviour would upset the overcommit beancounting though. Hundreds of megabytes of memory on the inactive list but not in pagecache probably looks like anonymous memory to the overcommit logic.
Does this bit mean the report was still somewhat useful (for fixing either ext3 or the overcommit accounting) though, or was it already well-known? Well, anyways, thanks heaps for the explanation, was going slowly mad here ... Rene. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/