Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2002-10-29

Re: 2.5.44-mm6

From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-29 17:22:06
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bill Davidsen wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted
Rik van Riel wrote:
quoted
Just let me know if you're interested in my load control mechanism
and I'll send it to you.
It would also be interesting to know if we really care?
I think there is a need for keeping an overloaded machine in some way
usable, not because anyone is really running it that way, but because
the sysadmin needs a way to determine why a correctly sized machine is
suddenly seeing a high load.
Indeed, it's a stability thing, not a performance thing.

It's Not Good(tm) to have a system completely crap out because
of a load spike. Instead it should survive the load spike and
go on with life.

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help