Re: 2.4.19 Vs 2.4.19-rmap14a with anonymous mmaped memory
From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-29 20:49:16
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
The perl script that writes tables isn't too informative without knowing how the tables are used. Pseudocode that says exactly what your final reference pattern is would be a lot more useful.
I guessed that after I thought about it for a while and reworked the algorithm for 0.7. To make things easier again, I added a new graph to the reports which is in 0.7 called "Page Index Reference over Time" see http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/projects/vmregress/output_sample/mmap/read/25000/mapanon.html It is the second graph. At the beginning, it is at the 0th page and it moves through the address space over time. A totally random one would make this graph look like noise. The graph should give a good idea how memory was referenced. In 0.6 and with these tests, it would have been a similar curve except the last page would have been hit around 40000 references before the end of the test. After that, the pages were referenced in a linear pattern which was a mistake after reviewing it a bit. If people are still interested, I'll run a full set of tests again on 2.4.19 and 2.4.19-rmap14a with 0.7 and post up the results complete with the page reference information so you don't have to guess this time. It takes about a full day to run a complete series. Any taker?
It would also be useful to state what you define as a reference. A user space program read-accesses a single byte from some address?
A reference in this test was reading a full page of information using copy_from_user() -- Mel Gorman MSc Student, University of Limerick http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/