Re: throttling dirtiers
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-31 21:35:25
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted
First off, make it obvious where we block in the allocation path (pawning off all memory reaping to kswapd et al is an easy first step here). Then make allocators cycle through on a FIFO basis by using something like the page reservation patch I came up with a while ago. That'll give us an easy place to change scheduling behaviour.None of that will preferentially throttle the source of dirty pages, which seems a good thing to do?
But it will throttle the page dirtiers we care about, ie. the ones allocating new memory. I'm not sure we care too much about re-dirtying pagecache pages; if that is happening we want to keep those pages resident anyway. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/