Re: [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take three
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-11 20:54:22
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
Rik van Riel wrote:quoted
...quoted
useful pagecache and swapping everything out. Our kernels have O_STREAMING because of this. It simply removes as much pagecache as it can, each time ->nrpages reaches 256. It's rather effective.Now why does that remind me of drop-behind ? ;)I looked at 2.4-ac as well. Seems that the dropbehind there only addresses reads?
It should also work on linear writes.
I suspect the best fix here is to not have dirty or writeback pagecache pages on the LRU at all. Throttle on memory coming reclaimable, put the pages back on the LRU when they're clean, etc. As we have often discussed. Big change.
That just doesn't make sense, if you don't put the dirty pages on the LRU then what incentive _do_ you have to write them out ? Will you start writing them out once you run out of clean pages ? Will you reclaim all glibc mapped pages before writing out dirty pages ? If the throttling is wrong, I propose we fix the trottling. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/