Re: [PATCH] updated low-latency zap_page_range
From: george anzinger <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-25 01:36:37
Also in:
lkml
From: george anzinger <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-25 01:36:37
Also in:
lkml
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On 24 Jul 2002, Robert Love wrote:quoted
if (preempt_count() == 1 && need_resched()) Then we get "if (0 && ..)" which should hopefully be evaluated away.I think preempt_count() is not unconditionally 0 for non-preemptible kernels, so I don't think this is a compile-time constant. That may be a bug in preempt_count(), of course.
Didn't we just put bh_count and irq_count in the same word??? -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/