Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
From: William Lee Irwin III <hidden>
Date: 2002-05-07 19:47:50
On Tuesday 07 May 2002 20:37, Christian Smith wrote:
quoted
- do_page_fault() is definately in the wrong place, or at least, the work it does (it finds the generic vma of the fault. This should be generic code.)
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:37:57PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
It's per-arch because different architectures have very different sets of conditions that have to be handled. If you like, you can try to break out some cross-arch factors and make them into inlines or something. That's cleanup work that's hard and mostly thankless. We need more gluttons for punishment^W^W^W volunteers to tackle this kind of thing.
I believe I'm already signed up for this, or at least I'm putting down code on this front. Cheers, Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/