Re: 2.4.8-pre1 and dbench -20% throughput

On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Hugh Dickins wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:

quoted

"Age" is hugely misleading, I think everybody agrees,

Yup. I mainly kept it because we called things this way
in the 1.2, 1.3, 2.0 and 2.1 kernels.

quoted

That said, I think BSD uses "weight".

That's much _much_ better: I'd go for "warmth" myself,

FreeBSD uses act_count, short for activation count.

Showing how active a page is is probably a better analogy
than the temperature one ... but that's just IMHO ;)

regards,

Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/