Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2001-03-22 10:29:09
Also in:
lkml
On 22 Mar 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Is there ever a case where killing init is the right thing to do? My impression is that if init is selected the whole machine dies. If you can kill init and still have a machine that mostly works, then I guess it makes some sense not to kill it. Guaranteeing not to select init can buy you piece of mind because init if properly setup can put the machine back together again, while not special casing init means something weird might happen and init would be selected.
When something weird happens, it might be better to kill init and have the machine reset itself after the panic (echo 30 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic). Killing all other things and leaving just init intact makes for a machine which is as good as dead, without a chance for recovery-by-reboot... OTOH, I haven't heard of the OOM killer ever chosing init, not even of people who tried creating these special kinds of situations to trigger it on purpose. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/