Re: Discussion on my OOM killer API
From: James Sutherland <hidden>
Date: 2000-10-30 09:41:33
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G?bor L?n?rt wrote:
quoted
quoted
Policy should be decided user-side, and should prevent the kernel-side killer EVER triggering.Only problem is that your user side process will have been pushed out of memory by netcape and that in this kind of situations it will take a looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooongNope. Use mlock(). Second it's clear that we should implement a stupid kernel side OOM killer too in case of something goes really wrong, but that killer can be really stupid and constant part of system. In normal cases user space OOM killer should do the job for us ...
Yes, that's my plan. AIUI, Ingo is going to do the kernel hooks I need, I'll do the userspace policy daemon? James. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/