Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2000-10-30

Re: Discussion on my OOM killer API

From: James Sutherland <hidden>
Date: 2000-10-30 09:41:33

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G?bor L?n?rt wrote:
quoted
quoted
Policy should be decided user-side, and should prevent the kernel-side
killer EVER triggering.
Only problem is that your user side process will have been pushed out
of memory by netcape and that in this kind of situations it will take
a looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong
Nope. Use mlock().
Second it's clear that we should implement a stupid kernel side OOM killer
too in case of something goes really wrong, but that killer can be really
stupid and constant part of system. In normal cases user space OOM killer
should do the job for us ...
Yes, that's my plan. AIUI, Ingo is going to do the kernel hooks I need,
I'll do the userspace policy daemon?


James.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help