Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2000-10-13

Re: 2.4.0test9 vm: disappointing streaming i/o under load

From: Chris Evans <hidden>
Date: 2000-10-11 20:59:10

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Eric Lowe wrote:
quoted
Unfortunately, 2.4.0test9 exhibits poor streaming i/o performance when
under a bit of memory pressure.
[...]
Would you try setting /proc/sys/vm/page-cluster to 8 or 16 and let
me know the results?  I think one _part_ of the problem is that
when the swapper isn't agressive enough, it causes too much disk
thrashing which gets in the way of normal I/O... my experience
has been that with modern disks with 512K+ cache you have to
write in 64K clusters to get optimum throughput.
Raising the cluster size didn't seem to do much apart from generally slow
down interactive response. Lowering it, however, seemed to make playback
less jittery. I guess that's to be expected; faulting in large chunks of
sequential i/o won't help much when under memory pressure because the
pages will get thrown out again before they get a chance to be
used. Especially with drop_behind.

Rik what do you think.

Cheers
Chris

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help