Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2000-10-09

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2000-10-09 19:07:32

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 08:42:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted
ignoring the kill would just preserve those bugs artificially.
If the oom killer kills a thing like init by mistake
That only happens in the "random" OOM killer 2.2 has ...
So you have two choices:

o	math proof that the current algorithm without the magic can't end
	killing init (and I should be able to proof the other way around
	instead)

o	have a magic check for init

So the magic is _strictly_ necessary at the moment.
No. It's only needed if your OOM algorithm is so crappy that
it might end up killing init by mistake.

Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
       -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help