Re: 2.4.0-t9p7 and mmap002 - freeze
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2000-09-29 14:54:12
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2000-09-29 14:54:12
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Another thing I'm curious about is increasing memory pressure in the event of an allocation failure (retry). Why do we do that?
We were short on free memory, so kswapd should work /harder/ to keep up with the current load.
P.S. in buffer.c, we do a LockPage(), but no UnlockPage() in the case of no_buffer_head.. is that correct?
No it isn't ;) Thanks for pointing out this one...
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/