Re: new vm - OK but not THAT great
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2000-08-16 19:09:30
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Benjamin Redelings wrote:
I tested Rik's latest, tuned, VM code on my machine at home. Sorry this isn't more detailed - I have to do some comparisons later.
However, I DO notice some problems: when I run netscape and a few other apps, performance is OK, but when I then run 'tar -xf linux-2.4.0-pre4.tar' preformance drops.
Indeed, I've seen this here as well. I have some ideas on fixing this and once I figure out all the details I'll implement and tune them. (but first, I have to fix the SMP bug where __alloc_pages hands out a page that has one of the PG_(in)active_* bits set...)
Secondly, programs like xfs, which are NOT RUNNING AT ALL, do not get swapped out as much as vanilla pre7-4. So, the page aging code does not appear to be helping as much as it should. Swapping seems, in some sense, to not as good as pre7-4...
This is also something which needs to be tuned more. Remember
that you're working with a VM patch that received only about
4 hours of tuning ;)
I hope any of the other VM hackers will use the quiet period
around the vger problems to help tune this VM patch a bit ;)
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/