Re: [RFC] RSS guarantees and limits
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2000-06-22 21:37:58
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Stephen Tweedie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:00:54PM +0100, John Fremlin wrote:quoted
quoted
- protect smaller apps from bigger memory hogsWhy? Yes, it's very altruistic, very sportsmanlike, but giving small, rarely used processes a form of social security is only going to increase bureaucracy ;-)It is critically important that when under memory pressure, a system administrator can still log in and kill any runaway processes. The smaller apps in question here are system daemons such as init, inetd and telnetd, and user apps such as bash and ps. We _must_ be able to allow them to make at least some progress while the VM is under load.
Also, the memory space used by these small apps is usually negligable compared to the memory used by the big program. What is 2% memory use for the big program can be the difference between running and crawling for something like bash... regards, Rik -- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength. Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/