Re: [PATCH] mincore for i386, against 2.3.51
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Date: 2000-03-13 20:31:33
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Chuck Lever wrote:
quoted
So I'd prefer something that does not have the "incore" function at all, and if that convinces somebody else to change shm to use the address_space stuff to get a working mincore(), all the better. Ok?hmm. i created the "incore" method because mincore needs to synchronize with the swapping method used for each of the different vma types. this is different for shm's vs. mapped files -- they both use locking methods that are independent of one another.
But that's exactly my poing. The shm version is bad, and it will be eventually removed ;)
btw i think i've ended up in your kill file. direct mail i send to you appears to be lost.
You'r enot in my kill-file any more than anybody else is. The fact that I get too much mail means that very few people get horribly much attention, I'm afraid. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/