Re: a plea for mincore()/madvise()
From: Chuck Lever <hidden>
Date: 2000-03-13 17:20:12
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
quoted
let me think some more about DONTNEED. at the face of it, i agree with your suggestion, but i may just exclude it from the patch until there is more discussion here.For what it's worth, Linus's request --- that DONTNEED throws stuff away without propagating dirty data --- is something that I've had big database folk asking us for more than once.
i believe that allowing an application to dispose of data this way is a good idea, and that it's something that Linux should allow. but there was an interesting discussion here on linux-mm recently that described a slightly different interface that would allow this and some other functionality too. i'd just like to study the suggestions a bit. the rest of madvise is already implemented, i just have to port it to 2.3.51. i'll post that piece of it soon. - Chuck Lever -- corporate: [off-list ref] personal: [off-list ref] or [off-list ref] The Linux Scalability project: http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/