Re: [RFC] 2.3.39 zone balancing
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2000-01-13 18:37:18
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted
I think that busier machines probably have a larger need for DMA memory than this code fragment will give us. I have the gut feeling that we'll want to keep about 512kB or more free in the lower 16MB of busy machines...2.2.x uses a simple algorithm. Normally allocations come from the main pool if it fails we use the DMA pool. That seems to work just fine.
Of course, I should have thought of that. Our `high-to-low' allocation strategy should make sure that the free pages `propagate down'... Now we'll only want to build something into kswapd so that rebalancing the high memory zones is done in the background. regards, Rik -- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.nl.linux.org/Linux-MM/