Re: [RFC] [RFT] [PATCH] memory zone balancing
From: Rik van Riel <hidden>
Date: 2000-01-04 15:47:53
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
d+r+h > limit d > limit/2 r > limit/4 h > limit/8
Ehmmm, wait. I messed up on this one. We probably want to have a bit more freedom so the page freeing algorithm doesn't do too much scanning for nothing. d+r+h > limit d > limit/4 r > limit/4 h don't care, even on a 1.5GB machine h will be 1/3 of total memory, so we'll usually have a few free pages in here
DMA pages should always be present, regular pages for storing pagetables and stuff need to be there too, higmem pages we don't really care about. Btw, I think we probably want to increase freepages.min to 512 or even more on machines that have >1GB of memory. The current limit of 256 was really intended for machines with a single zone of memory... (but on <1GB machines I don't know if it makes sense to raise the limit much more ... maybe we should raise the limit automagically if the page alloc/io rate is too high?)
Rik -- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.nl.linux.org/Linux-MM/