Re: More info: 2.1.108 page cache performance on low memory
From: Stephen C. Tweedie <hidden>
Date: 1998-07-20 20:12:48
Hi, On 18 Jul 1998 11:40:20 -0500, ebiederm+eric@npwt.net (Eric W. Biederman) said:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"ZC" == Zlatko Calusic [off-list ref] writes:Let me just step back a second so I can be clear:
A) The idea proposed by Stephen way perhaps we could use Least Recently Used lists instead of page aging. It's effectively the same thing but shrink_mmap can find the old pages much much faster, by simply following a linked list.
B) This idea intrigues me because handling of generic dirty pages I have about the same problem. In cloneing bdflush for the page cache I discovered two fields I would need to add to struct page to do an exact cloning job. A page writetime, and LRU list pointers for dirty pages. I went ahead and implemented them, but also implemented an alternative, which is the default.
We already have all of the inode's pages on a linked list. Extending that to have two separate lists, one for clean pages and one for dirty, would be cheap and would not have the extra memory overhead. --Stephen -- This is a majordomo managed list. To unsubscribe, send a message with the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org