Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: mediatek,dpi: Add mt8195 dpintf
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Date: 2021-08-18 07:33:11
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel
Hi, On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:45:46PM +0800, CK Hu wrote:
Hi, Markus: On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 21:25 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:quoted
DP_INTF is similar to the actual dpi. They differ in some points regarding registers and what needs to be set but the function blocks itself are similar in design. Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> --- .../display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml | 48 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml index dd2896a40ff0..de4bdacd83ac 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ $id: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml*__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!z5TyPvbq3ZLHjRPscOHigUMlikjhtJMFrEQqemcjQZa4NaXBE9tzMnDFMa1qYg$ $schema: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml*__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!z5TyPvbq3ZLHjRPscOHigUMlikjhtJMFrEQqemcjQZa4NaXBE9tzMnAjuBCxsg$ -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings +title: mediatek DPI/DP_INTF Controller Device Tree Bindings maintainers: - CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ maintainers: description: | The Mediatek DPI function block is a sink of the display subsystem and provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a parallel - output bus. + output bus. The Mediatek DP_INTF is a similar function block that is + connected to the (embedded) display port function block. properties: compatible:@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ properties: - mediatek,mt8173-dpi - mediatek,mt8183-dpi - mediatek,mt8192-dpi + - mediatek,mt8195-dpintfI've reviewed the modification in driver, it seems that dpintf is almost the same as dpi. Why use the name "dpintf"? I could accept this name only it's defined by hardware data sheet.
Yes the data sheet makes a distinction between DPI and DP_INTF. mt8195 has a DPI unit as well. DP_INTF has a slightly different feature set and also uses slightly different register bits. Best, Markus
Regards, CKquoted
reg: maxItems: 1@@ -37,10 +39,11 @@ properties: - description: DPI PLL clock-names: - items: - - const: pixel - - const: engine - - const: pll + description: + For dpi clocks pixel, engine and pll are required. For dpintf pixel, pll, + pll_d2, pll_d4, pll_d8, pll_d16, hf_fmm, hf_fdp are required. + minItems: 3 + maxItems: 8 pinctrl-0: true pinctrl-1: true@@ -64,6 +67,39 @@ required: - clock-names - port +allOf: + - if: + properties: + compatible: + contains: + enum: + - mediatek,mt8195-dpintf + then: + properties: + clocks: + minItems: 8 + maxItems: 8 + clock-names: + items: + - const: pixel + - const: pll + - const: pll_d2 + - const: pll_d4 + - const: pll_d8 + - const: pll_d16 + - const: hf_fmm + - const: hf_fdp + else: + properties: + clocks: + minItems: 3 + maxItems: 3 + clock-names: + items: + - const: pixel + - const: engine + - const: pll + additionalProperties: false examples:
_______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek