On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Hans Verkuil [off-list ref] wrote:

Several new structs do not have any field documentation, but they do start with /**,
so I get complaints about missing field docs.

After manually changing this to /*, I still get a few remaining warnings:

Will fix in next version.

mtk-vcodec/vdec/vdec_h264_req_if.c:189: warning: Function parameter or member 'h264_slice_params' not described in 'vdec_h264_vsi'
mtk-vcodec/vdec/vdec_h264_req_if.c:210: warning: Function parameter or member 'h264_slice_param' not described in 'vdec_h264_slice_inst'
mtk-vcodec/vdec/vdec_h264_req_if.c:210: warning: Function parameter or member 'dpb' not described in 'vdec_h264_slice_inst'

Can you fix this?

Will fix in next version.

I also want to take this patch series at the same time:

https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/cover/20210630085247.27554-1-irui.wang@mediatek.com/

Can you verify that this would not cause any problems with your series? As far as
I can see it is fine, but a second pair of eyeballs wouldn't hurt.

Series [1] shouldn't cause any problems with this series.

However, series [1] doesn't apply after this series (conflicted with
[2]).  It needs to rebase and send another version after fixing the
typo anyway.

[1]: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/cover/20210630085247.27554-1-irui.wang@mediatek.com/
[2]: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20210630085247.27554-3-irui.wang@mediatek.com/

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek