Re: [PATCH v3 04/27] drm: Don't test for IRQ support in VBLANK ioctls
From: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Date: 2021-06-24 10:27:40
Also in:
amd-gfx, dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-samsung-soc, linux-sunxi, linux-tegra, nouveau
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:07:57AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi Am 24.06.21 um 10:51 schrieb Jani Nikula:quoted
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Thomas Zimmermann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Am 24.06.21 um 10:06 schrieb Jani Nikula:quoted
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Thomas Zimmermann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c index 3417e1ac7918..10fe16bafcb6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c@@ -1748,8 +1748,16 @@ int drm_wait_vblank_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, unsigned int pipe_index; unsigned int flags, pipe, high_pipe; - if (!dev->irq_enabled) - return -EOPNOTSUPP; +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY) + if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))) { + if (!dev->irq_enabled) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } else /* if DRIVER_MODESET */ +#endif + { + if (!drm_dev_has_vblank(dev)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + }Sheesh I hate this kind of inline #ifdefs. Two alternate suggestions that I believe should be as just efficient:Or how about: static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev) { if defined(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY) if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))) return dev->irq_enabled; #endif return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev); } ? It's inline, but still readable.It's definitely better than the original, but it's unclear to me why you'd prefer this over option 2) below. I guess the only reason I can think of is emphasizing the conditional compilation. However, IS_ENABLED() is widely used in this manner specifically to avoid inline #if, and the compiler optimizes it away.It's simply more readable to me as the condition is simpler. But option 2 is also ok.
Either option looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> Thanks for doing that! Liviu
Best regards Thomasquoted
BR, Jani.quoted
Best regards Thomasquoted
1) The more verbose: #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY) static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev) { if (unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))) return dev->irq_enabled; else return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev); } #else static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev) { return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev); } #endif 2) The more compact: static bool drm_wait_vblank_supported(struct drm_device *dev) { if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY) && unlikely(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))) return dev->irq_enabled; else return drm_dev_has_vblank(dev); } Then, in drm_wait_vblank_ioctl(). if (!drm_wait_vblank_supported(dev)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; The compiler should do the right thing without any explicit inline keywords etc. BR, Jani.quoted
if (vblwait->request.type & _DRM_VBLANK_SIGNAL) return -EINVAL;@@ -2023,7 +2031,7 @@ int drm_crtc_get_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - if (!dev->irq_enabled) + if (!drm_dev_has_vblank(dev)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; crtc = drm_crtc_find(dev, file_priv, get_seq->crtc_id);@@ -2082,7 +2090,7 @@ int drm_crtc_queue_sequence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - if (!dev->irq_enabled) + if (!drm_dev_has_vblank(dev)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; crtc = drm_crtc_find(dev, file_priv, queue_seq->crtc_id);-- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek