On 6/1/21 9:15 PM, Rocco Yue wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 18:38 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:16 AM, Rocco Yue wrote:
quoted
quoted
For this patch set, if RA message carries the mtu option,
"proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/<iface>/ra_mtu" will be updated to the
mtu value carried in the last RA message received, and ra_mtu
is an independent proc file, which is not affected by the update
of interface mtu value.
I am not a fan of more /proc/sys files.
You are adding it to devconf which is good. You can add another link
attribute, e.g., IFLA_RA_MTU, and have it returned on link queries.
Make sure the attribute can not be sent in a NEWLINK or SETLINK request;
it should be read-only for GETLINK.
Thanks for your review and advice.
Do you mean that I should keep the ra_mtu proc and add an another extra netlink msg?
Or only use netlink msg instead of ra_mtu proc?
I will do it.
I meant DEVCONF and notification to userspace was good, but using an
IFLA attribute and no proc/sys file is better.
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek