Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 17:05 +0900, Alexandre Courbot a écrit :

Hi Hans, thanks for the review!

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:28 PM Hans Verkuil [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 27/04/2021 13:15, Alexandre Courbot wrote:

quoted

From: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com>

The stateless API requires a media device for issuing requests. Add one
if we are being instantiated as a stateless decoder.

Why for the stateless decoder only? Why not create one for all?

It's not a blocker, but I would recommend looking at this.

Would there be any use in creating a media device for a stateful
decoder that does not need to use requests?

The only thing I can think of is classification. In GStreamer support for
stateless decoders, I use the topology to classify what is a decoder by walking
the toplogy and making sure it's what I expect, and that there is no other
branches or functions that I may not support. This makes it more strict, so less
likely to confuse driver function.

Note that v4l2-compliance just use the same old heuristic we have used for
stateful, which is to check that one side have only RAW format, and the other
side have only encoded formats. It works too, it's just less strict.

Cheers,
Alex.

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek