On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 6:38 PM Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 04:11:03PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
quoted
I misunderstood. It still needs the compatible string to match the
corresponding driver.
No, it doesn't. The MFD should be registering the platform device.
I guess I see. It lists the mfd_cell when calling
devm_mfd_add_devices() in drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c. It falls back to
use driver name and device name to match. As long as the name
provided in mfd_cell matches the platform driver name, it works.
But I found struct mfd_cell also contains member .of_compatible. What
is the difference if we use compatible string (as is) for this device
instead of falling back to use device name to match?
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek