Re: [PATCH v12 1/4] clk: mediatek: Add MT2701 clock support
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-29 17:46:29
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 08/27, James Liao wrote:
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 10:49 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
On 08/22, Erin Lo wrote:quoted
+ +static void __init mtk_infrasys_init_early(struct device_node *node) +{ + int r, i; + + if (!infra_clk_data) { + infra_clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_INFRA_NR); + + for (i = 0; i < CLK_INFRA_NR; i++) + infra_clk_data->clks[i] = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER); + } + + mtk_clk_register_factors(infra_fixed_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(infra_fixed_divs), + infra_clk_data); + + r = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, infra_clk_data); + if (r) + pr_err("%s(): could not register clock provider: %d\n", + __func__, r); +} +CLK_OF_DECLARE(mtk_infra, "mediatek,mt2701-infracfg", mtk_infrasys_init_early);This should use CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER? Has this been tested on latest clk-next? Some recent patches make it so that CLK_OF_DECLARE() prevents platform devices from being created for the associated DT nodes that match during of_clk_init().Oops, you are right. Clocks in infra_clks are gone on clk-next, but they are good on v4.8-rc1. I register clk13m in infra_fixed_divs through CLK_OF_DECLARE() so that it can be registered as early as possible because it will be referred by the timer driver. Is there a formal way to separate clock registrations on the same clock provider? Or should I move infra_clks registration into CLK_OF_DECLARE()?
The way to do this is use CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER() and then do the early clks in the CLK_OF callback and the rest of them in the driver probe. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project