Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: add Mediatek display PWM driver support
From: YH Huang <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-14 14:52:23
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-pwm, lkml
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:26:22PM +0800, YH Huang wrote:quoted
+ +static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *pwm;The struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip * is named 'mpc' in the other functions. For consistency reasons you should do that here aswell.
I miss it! Maybe 'mdpc' is a better name for mtk_disp_pwm_chip.
quoted
+ struct resource *r; + int ret; + + pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pwm) + return -ENOMEM; + + pwm->dev = &pdev->dev; + + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + pwm->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r); + if (IS_ERR(pwm->mmio_base)) + return PTR_ERR(pwm->mmio_base); + + pwm->clk_main = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "main"); + if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk_main)) + return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk_main); + pwm->clk_mm = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mm"); + if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk_mm)) + return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk_mm); + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk_main); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk_mm); + if (ret < 0) { + clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk_main); + return ret; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm); + + pwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev; + pwm->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops; + pwm->chip.base = -1; + pwm->chip.npwm = NUM_PWM; + + ret = pwmchip_add(&pwm->chip); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret;This error path leaves the clocks enabled.
I forgot this one. I will fix it.
quoted
+ } + + return 0; +} + +static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + if (WARN_ON(!pc)) + return -ENODEV; + + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk_main); + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk_mm); + + return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);You should first remove the pwmchip and disable the clocks afterwards. Also note that this function can fail.
OK.
Sascha
Thank for your suggestion. Regards, YH Huang