Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2016-09-08

Re: [PATCH v3] docs-rst: ignore arguments on macro definitions

From: Markus Heiser <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-29 14:12:54

Am 29.08.2016 um 15:13 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab [off-list ref]:
A macro definition is mapped via .. c:function:: at the
ReST markup when using the following kernel-doc tag:

	/**
	 * DMX_FE_ENTRY - Casts elements in the list of registered
	 *               front-ends from the generic type struct list_head
	 *               to the type * struct dmx_frontend
	 *
	 * @list: list of struct dmx_frontend
	 */
	 #define DMX_FE_ENTRY(list) \
	        list_entry(list, struct dmx_frontend, connectivity_list)

However, unlike a function description, the arguments of a macro
doesn't contain the data type.

This causes warnings when enabling Sphinx on nitkpick mode,
like this one:
	./drivers/media/dvb-core/demux.h:358: WARNING: c:type reference target not found: list
I think this is a drawback of sphinx's C-domain, using function
definition for macros also. From the function documentation

 """This is also used to describe function-like preprocessor
    macros. The names of the arguments should be given so
    they may be used in the description."""

I think about to fix the nitpick message for macros (aka function
directive) in the C-domain extension (we already have).

But for this, I need a rule to distinguish between macros
and functions ... is the uppercase of the macro name a good
rule to suppress the nitpick message? Any other suggestions?

-- Markus --
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
That happens because kernel-doc output for the above is:

	.. c:function:: DMX_FE_ENTRY ( list)

	   Casts elements in the list of registered front-ends from the generic type struct list_head to the type * struct dmx_frontend

	**Parameters**

	``list``
	  list of struct dmx_frontend

As the type is blank, Sphinx would think that ``list`` is a type,
and will try to add a cross reference for it, using their internal
representation for c:type:`list`.

However, ``list`` is not a type. So, that would cause either the
above warning, or if a ``list`` type exists, it would create
a reference to the wrong place at the doc.

To avoid that, let's ommit macro arguments from c:function::
declaration. As each argument will appear below the Parameters,
the type of the argument can be described there, if needed.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <redacted>
---

v3: version 2 patch caused a regression when handling function arguments,
because the counter were not incremented on all cases. Fix it.

scripts/kernel-doc | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
index d225e178aa1b..bac0af4fc659 100755
--- a/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -1846,14 +1846,15 @@ sub output_function_rst(%) {
	if ($count ne 0) {
	    print ", ";
	}
-	$count++;
	$type = $args{'parametertypes'}{$parameter};

	if ($type =~ m/([^\(]*\(\*)\s*\)\s*\(([^\)]*)\)/) {
	    # pointer-to-function
	    print $1 . $parameter . ") (" . $2;
-	} else {
+	    $count++;
+	} elsif ($type ne "") {
	    print $type . " " . $parameter;
+	    $count++;
	}
   }
   print ")\n\n";
-- 
2.7.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help