Hi Scott,

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:59:45PM +0800, Scott Jiang wrote:

quoted

quoted

If I disable this interrupt, other errors like fifo underflow are ignored.
Perhaps I can add a parameter in platform data to let user decide to
register this interrupt or not.

I think a more generic solution would be preferrable. If that causes
ignoring real errors, that's of course bad. I  wonder if there would be a
way around that.

Is there a publicly available datasheet for the bridge that I could take a
look at?

Yes, http://www.analog.com/en/processors-dsp/blackfin/adsp-bf548/processors/technical-documentation/index.html.
There is a hardware reference manual for bf54x, bridge is eppi.

Yeah, indeed it's the first time I see hardware like this. So to support
this properly, we truly need the new sensor control interface and an ability
to make those blanking values unchangeable.

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi	jabber/XMPP/Gmail: sailus@retiisi.org.uk