[Bug 220726] Patch of ioctl_vt (2), small clarification.
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
Date: 2025-12-13 15:41:27
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220726
--- Comment #7 from Alejandro Colomar (alx@kernel.org) ---Hi Teika, On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 08:00:04AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220726 teika kazura (teika@gmx.com) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #308874|0 |1 is obsolete| |--- Comment #6 from teika kazura (teika@gmx.com) ---Created attachment 309016 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=309016&action=edit My version of vt_ioctl.2 This is the third version of vt_ioctl.2. Unlike preceding versions this is not a patch, but the entire file. The second version was posted to the mailing list: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/20251110.165618.2111633615163528521.teika@gmx.com/T/#u (local)>. The accuracy was justified in the post cited above (and follow up emails.) My contribution is released to the public domain. I don't post the corresponding patch, but it is based on the git HEAD as of today, i.e. <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git/commit/man/man2/ioctl_vt.2?id=9fbe82>. The project refuses my work to merge because of not complying with its policy about the use of AIs. I believe my improvement helps, so hereby post for the community's sake.
We don't refuse to take your work. You seem to refuse to follow our policies. You're welcome to do work that is clean of AI, and we'll consider it. But AI-derived code will not be accepted anywhere in this project, including the bugzilla. I've marked the attachment as private. Have a lovely day! Alex
Best regards.
-- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.