fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no?
From: enh <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-23 18:40:28
subject says it all... the "This flag is not currently implemented." on the man page is wrong, i think?
- fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · enh <hidden> · 2024-08-23
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> · 2024-08-25
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · enh <hidden> · 2024-08-26
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> · 2024-08-26
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · enh <hidden> · 2024-08-26
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> · 2024-08-26
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · enh <hidden> · 2024-08-27
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> · 2024-08-29
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · enh <hidden> · 2024-12-16
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> · 2024-12-16
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · enh <hidden> · 2024-12-16
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> · 2024-12-16
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · enh <hidden> · 2024-12-16
- Re: fchmodat(2) does support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW now, no? · Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> · 2024-12-16