Re: LINE_MAX
From: Vincent Lefevre <hidden>
Date: 2024-05-21 11:40:35
On 2024-05-21 12:08:13 +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 12:26:58AM GMT, Vincent Lefevre wrote:quoted
See thread "fgets/strtok and LINE_MAX" I started on 2009-09-21 in the Austin Group mailing-list. It is available on gmane: Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vincent Lefevre <redacted> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.standards.posix.austin.general Subject: fgets/strtok and LINE_MAX Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:03:13 +0200 Lines: 31 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: [off-list ref] [...]Hmmm, how does that thing work?
You need a NNTP client, such a "tin", and the server is currently news.gmane.io (news.gmane.org was the one at that time, but it changed in January 2020). If you use "tin", you may use something like news.gmane.io .newsrc-gmane gmane in the .tin/newsrctable file, and run "tin -g gmane".
Any http link available?
For Gmane, it is no longer possible to access it via http. And I don't know any website that has archives for such old Austin Group messages.
quoted
There's the issue with the missing "+1", but also whether LINE_MAX < INT_MAX.I guess the LINE_MAX <? INT_MAX issue is not an actual issue as long as implementations do the Right Thing and don't set it to >= INT_MAX.
Unfortunately, the int type is typically a 32-bit type, even on 64-bit platforms. This would mean a silly limit for 64-bit platforms. 2^31 is quite large, but for some particular uses (hmm... GNU MPFR tests, for instance?), one may want to support larger text files. Note also that some XML files have all the contents on a single line. -- Vincent Lefèvre [off-list ref] - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)