Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] alloca.3: clarify reasoning for no error return in BUGS
From: наб <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-17 20:35:37
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes
From: наб <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-17 20:35:37
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 09:42:26PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
On 9/14/21 2:41 PM, наб wrote:quoted
diff --git a/man3/alloca.3 b/man3/alloca.3 index 71348e609..20761b079 100644 --- a/man3/alloca.3 +++ b/man3/alloca.3 -There is no error indication if the stack frame cannot be extended. -(However, after a failed allocation, the program is likely to receive a +Due to the nature of the stack, it is impossible to check if the allocation +would overflow the space available, and, hence, neither is indicating an error.I'm not sure this use of neither (without a preceding "not") is valid English. Is it?
I don't see why not: "impossible" provides the first negation (the "not" is lives in the "in-" prefix (well, "im-" because it's before a bilabial plosive), and "neither" is in its "likewise not" adverbial use). наб