[PATCH 17/32] seccomp_unotify.2: Minor tweaks to Rodrigo's patch
From: Alejandro Colomar <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-28 20:20:33
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <redacted> --- man2/seccomp_unotify.2 | 32 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2/seccomp_unotify.2 b/man2/seccomp_unotify.2
index 9bd27214f..ae449ae36 100644
--- a/man2/seccomp_unotify.2
+++ b/man2/seccomp_unotify.2@@ -740,16 +740,18 @@ use the file descriptor number specified in the .I newfd field. .TP -.BR SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND -Available since Linux 5.14, combines the +.BR SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND " (since Linux 5.14)" +Combines the .B SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD ioctl with .B SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND -into an atomic operation. On successful invocation, the target process's -errno will be 0 and the return value will be the file descriptor number that was -installed in the target. If allocating the file descriptor in the tatget fails, -the target's syscall continues to be blocked until a successful response is -sent. +into an atomic operation. +On successful invocation, the target process's errno will be 0 +and the return value will be the file descriptor number +that was installed in the target. +If allocating the file descriptor in the tatget fails, +the target's syscall continues to be blocked +until a successful response is sent. .RE .TP .I srcfd
@@ -1149,14 +1151,6 @@ that would normally be restarted by the .BR SA_RESTART flag. -.PP -Furthermore, if the supervisor response is a file descriptor -added with -.B SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, -then the flag -.B SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND -can be used to atomically add the file descriptor and return that value, -making sure no file descriptors are inadvertently leaked into the target. .\" FIXME .\" About the above, Kees Cook commented: .\"
@@ -1176,6 +1170,14 @@ making sure no file descriptors are inadvertently leaked into the target. .\" calls because it's impossible for the kernel to restart the call .\" with the right timeout value. I wonder what happens when those .\" system calls are restarted in the scenario we're discussing.) +.PP +Furthermore, if the supervisor response is a file descriptor +added with +.B SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, +then the flag +.B SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND +can be used to atomically add the file descriptor and return that value, +making sure no file descriptors are inadvertently leaked into the target. .SH BUGS If a .BR SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV
--
2.32.0