Re: [PATCH resend] netlink.7: note not reliable if NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2021-03-06 00:11:05
Also in:
netdev
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 12:21:59AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
If I understand correctly, the connection tracking netlink interface is an exception here because it has its own handling of dealing with congestion ("more reliable"?) so you need to disable the "default congestion control"?In conntrack, you have to combine NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS with NETLINK_BROADCAST_ERROR, then it's the kernel turns on the "more reliable" event delivery.The "more reliable" event delivery guarantees that the kernel will deliver at least the DESTROY notification (connection close). If the userspace program is stuck, kernel has to hold on the expired entries. Eventually conntrack stops accepting new connections because the table is full. So this feature can't be recommended as a best-practice for conntrack either.
There are two use-cases for this: - If you run conntrackd and you really want to sure you backup firewall does not get out of sync. - If you run ulogd2 and you want to make sure your connection log is complete (no events got lost). In both cases, this might comes at the cost of dropping packets if the table gets full. So it's placing the pressure on the conntrack side. With the right policy you could restrict the number of connection per second. I agree though that combination of NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS and NETLINK_BROADCAST_ERROR only makes sense for very specific use-cases.