Hello, Michael.

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:01:11PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

Can you please confirm that it's only necessary to delegate this file
if we are delegating a threaded subtree?

Replied on the other thread.  The file isn't delegatable as far as I
can tell.

So, following on from the discussion in the other thread, my
question above still stands.

Oh, I frankly haven't thought about delegating a threaded subtree.

I'm still confused. cgroup-v2.txt documents the possibility. You
wrote that text. We just had a conversation in another thread about the
fact that cgroup.threads is delegatable. You must have thought at 
least a little about this?

Oh, I'm probably mixing up two things.

1. When delegating, cgroup.threads should be delegated.  Doing that
   selectively doesn't achieve anything meaningful.

2. I haven't thought much about delegating a sub-protion of a threaded
   subtree.  Everything works the same way.  I just can't think of a
   use case.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html