Re: [PATCH] recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable
From: Nikola Forró <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-09 13:10:41
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2018-01-08 · Re: [PATCH] recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable · Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <hidden>
- 2018-01-04 · Re: [PATCH] recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable · Nikola Forró <hidden>
- 2017-10-26 · [PATCH] recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable · Nikola Forró <hidden>
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 00:39 +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
I am not sure that I understand that last sentence. Do you mean something
like:
The caller can retry the transmission, starting at first failed message,
but there is no guarantee that, if an error is returned, it will be the
same error as the one that was lost on the previous call.
?Hello Michael, yes, that's exactly what I meant. I'll update and re-send the patch. Thanks, Nikola -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html