Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-03-28

Re: ptrace(2): wrong kernel version for PTRACE_SEIZE and others

From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-28 03:55:14

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi Dmitry,

On 23 March 2016 at 00:16, Dmitry V. Levin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:21:28PM -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
quoted
The ptrace(2) man page says that PTRACE_SEIZE, PTRACE_LISTEN, and
PTRACE_INTERRUPT was introduced in Linux 3.4. In fact, this was added
in 3.1:

$ git diff v3.0 v3.1 include/linux/ptrace.h | grep SEIZE
+#define PTRACE_SEIZE           0x4206
+/* flags in @data for PTRACE_SEIZE */
+#define PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL     0x80000000 /* temp flag for development */
Yes, PTRACE_SEIZE was introduced by commit v3.1-rc1~308^2~28, but
it had to be used along with a temporary flag PTRACE_SEIZE_DEVEL,
which was removed later by commit v3.4-rc1~109^2~20.

That is, between v3.0 and v3.4 we had a test mode of PTRACE_SEIZE API,
which was not compatible with the current PTRACE_SEIZE API introduced
in Linux 3.4.
So, it sounds like the page is good as it stands, right?

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help