[Bug 103701] timegm() manpage suggests a terrible workaround
From: <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-10 23:48:14
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-03-10 · [Bug 103701] timegm() manpage suggests a terrible workaround · <hidden>
- 2016-03-10 · [Bug 103701] timegm() manpage suggests a terrible workaround · <hidden>
- 2016-03-10 · [Bug 103701] timegm() manpage suggests a terrible workaround · <hidden>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103701 Michael Kerrisk [off-list ref] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |CODE_FIX
--- Comment #4 from Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ---Okay--you two convinced me. I killed the sample timegm() implementation and added mention of UTC. Thread-safety issues are covered already in ATTRIBUTES. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html