Ted,
On 02/21/2015 03:56 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:49:34AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
quoted
quoted
This mount option significantly reduces writes to the
inode table for workloads that perform frequent random
writes to preallocated files.
This seems like an overly specific description of a single workload out
of many which may benefit, but what do others think? "inode table" is also
fairly extN-specific.
How about somethign like "This mount significantly reduces writes
needed to update the inode's timestamps, especially mtime and actime.
What is "actime" in the preceding line? Should it be "ctime"?
Examples of workloads where this could be a large win include frequent
random writes to preallocated files, as well as cases where the
MS_STRICTATIME mount option is enabled."?
I think some version of the following text could also usefully go
into the page, but...
(The advantage of MS_STRICTATIME | MS_LAZYTIME is that stat system
calls will return the correctly updated atime, but those atime updates
won't get flushed to disk unless the inode needs to be updated for
file system / data consistency reasons, or when the inode is pushed
out of memory, or when the file system is unmounted.)
I find the wording of there a little confusing. Is the following
a correct rewrite:
The advantage of MS_STRICTATIME | MS_LAZYTIME is that stat(2)
will return the correctly updated atime, but the atime updates
will be flushed to disk only when (1) the inode needs to be
updated for filesystem / data consistency reasons or (2) the
inode is pushed out of memory, or (3) the filesystem is
unmounted.)
?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html