On Monday 19 March 2012 16:45:41 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
A quick question about one piece:
quoted
+The count values might be individually capped according to
\fIUIO_MAXIOV\fP. +If the Linux kernel is capped at smaller values, the
C library will take care +of emulating the limit it exposes (if it is
bigger) so the user only needs to +care about that (what the C library
defines).
I don't see anything in glibc that does this. Have I missed something?
i think you're correct. the code in glibc atm is merely a syscall(). i think
the idea was to have the C library guarantee that and if moving forward the
kernel changes, the C library would update by adding a wrapper. maybe just
drop this sentence until that day comes ?
-mike