Re: Man page doc for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE
From: Sunil Mushran <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-19 18:27:45
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Sunil Mushran <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-19 18:27:45
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On 09/19/2011 10:57 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/18/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:quoted
+ +.BR SEEK_DATA +and +.BR SEEK_HOLE +are nonstandard extensions also present in Solaris.Looks good to me, but you may also want to link to the proposed wording for mandating SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA in the eventual POSIX Issue 8 (POSIX 2008 is Issue 7): http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=415 Also, it seems a shame that the kernel can fail with EINVAL instead of properly emulating SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA even on file systems with no underlying support for reporting holes.
Why do you say that? If I am reading generic_file_llseek_unlocked() correctly, the default behavior is treat offset < i_size as data. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html