Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi [off-list ref] wrote:

Michael,

quoted

You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:

Oh, come on.  Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes
shouldn't be applied?

I didn't say you did.  However, while saying "I understand your
frustration", you simply ignored this question, which I would say was
fairly important in the context, and asked me to write another version
of the patch against your tree.  My takeaway from this is that you
attach a higher priority to seeing that your tree isn't broken, than
to seeing that these bugs get fixed.

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html