Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

Miklos,

You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Michael Kerrisk
[off-list ref] wrote:

Miklos,

I already fixed most of the isues with utimensat() in my previous
version of the patch several days back, and that patch (probably
still) applies against current mainline.

[...]

This is a bug.  It is one of *several* bugs in the original
implementation of the utimensat()/futimens() interface.  All of them
should be fixed.  I have by now provided fixes for most of them.  (Not
point 2 above, but with a little help that should be quickly fixed as
well.)  At this point, I think you need to explain why you think those
fixes shouldn't be applied.

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html