Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:22:30PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

For 2) you can just use permission() instead of vfs_permission() which
is exactly the same in this case (and consolidated into a common
function later in the vfs-cleanups tree).

Miklos, don't delude people into thinking the vfs-cleanups tree is ever
going to get merged in its current state.  Al's NAKed the path_* stuff,
Christoph's NAKed it too.  Ignoring them and putting up a VFS tree of
your own is not going to help matters.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html