Re: [PATCH] leds: core: add helpers for calling brightness_set(_blocking)
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-02-13 18:31:59
Am 12.02.2016 um 17:10 schrieb Jacek Anaszewski:
On 02/07/2016 01:20 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:quoted
Add helpers for calling brightness_set(_blocking) allowing to simplify the code and make it better readable. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> --- drivers/leds/led-core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c index ad684b6..c29e4c9 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/led-core.c +++ b/drivers/leds/led-core.c@@ -25,6 +25,26 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(leds_list_lock); LIST_HEAD(leds_list); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(leds_list); +static int led_set_output(struct led_classdev *cdev,s/cdev/led_cdev/ Please adhere to the existing naming convention. led_set_output isn't too informative name, and can be misleading. We already have a number of different internal functions for setting LED brightness, so we have to be careful when adding new ones. At the moment I don't have any good candidate. __led_set_brightness() and __led_set_brightness_blocking() as a last resort. We had the former at some point. Nonetheless it would be great if you came up with some better names:)
I was expecting such a remark as I wasn't too happy with the names either. But I had (and still have) no really good idea for a telling name being not too long (as I'd like to avoid Java-like variable names spanning across more than one line). Having said that your proposal of using a double underscore prefix might still be the best compromise.
quoted
+ enum led_brightness value) +{ + if (!cdev->brightness_set) + return -ENOTSUPP; + + cdev->brightness_set(cdev, value); + + return 0; +} + +static int led_set_output_blocking(struct led_classdev *cdev, + enum led_brightness value) +{ + if (!cdev->brightness_set_blocking) + return -ENOTSUPP; + + return cdev->brightness_set_blocking(cdev, value); +} + static void led_timer_function(unsigned long data) { struct led_classdev *led_cdev = (void *)data;@@ -91,13 +111,10 @@ static void set_brightness_delayed(struct work_struct *ws) led_cdev->flags &= ~LED_BLINK_DISABLE; } - if (led_cdev->brightness_set) - led_cdev->brightness_set(led_cdev, led_cdev->delayed_set_value); - else if (led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking) - ret = led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking(led_cdev, - led_cdev->delayed_set_value); - else - ret = -ENOTSUPP; + ret = led_set_output(led_cdev, led_cdev->delayed_set_value); + if (ret == -ENOTSUPP) + ret = led_set_output_blocking(led_cdev, + led_cdev->delayed_set_value); if (ret < 0 && /* LED HW might have been unplugged, therefore don't warn */ !(ret == -ENODEV && (led_cdev->flags & LED_UNREGISTERING) &&@@ -236,10 +253,8 @@ void led_set_brightness_nopm(struct led_classdev *led_cdev, enum led_brightness value) { /* Use brightness_set op if available, it is guaranteed not to sleep */ - if (led_cdev->brightness_set) { - led_cdev->brightness_set(led_cdev, value); + if (!led_set_output(led_cdev, value)) return; - } /* If brightness setting can sleep, delegate it to a work queue task */ led_cdev->delayed_set_value = value;@@ -270,10 +285,7 @@ int led_set_brightness_sync(struct led_classdev *led_cdev, if (led_cdev->flags & LED_SUSPENDED) return 0; - if (led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking) - return led_cdev->brightness_set_blocking(led_cdev, - led_cdev->brightness); - return -ENOTSUPP; + return led_set_output_blocking(led_cdev, led_cdev->brightness); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(led_set_brightness_sync);