Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] Common Dell SMBIOS API
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-02-08 20:43:41
Also in:
lkml, platform-driver-x86
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
Hi, On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:20:14AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:quoted
My only major concern is module load order dependencies. Inter-module dependencies are frowned upon with good reason, the kernel load ordering is non-deterministic and it's possible, for example, for dell-laptop to fail to find the symbols exported by dell-smbios under certain conditions. I have worked around this in the past with things like the following: #ifdef MODULE #ifdef CONFIG_FOO_MODULE if (request_module("foo")) return -ENODEV; #endif #endif Something like the above may be necessary for dell-smbios in dell-laptop, dell-wmi, and dell-leds now that they depend on the dell-smbios exported functions. Cc Greg in case there is a better way to handle this that I'm not aware of.Deferred probing seems to be the preferred way, see e.g.: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-January/098404.html (In this example, apple_gmux_present() determines presence of the device and !vga_switcheroo_handler_flags() determine non-presence of its driver.) This will also work if the subsystem depended on is compiled in rather than in a module.
Ah, interesting. Thanks Lukas. Sounds like we're going to be fine as is with this particular case. Thanks, -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center